R-4417Fine navy pinstripe suiting
Phone, main lens, 1080p · stated at 1.4 m
This is the read that breaks the habit. The cloth is clean where the shot is already framed and gets worse the further back you go.
Moire
LowMoire: Low risk, 1 of 3.
A repeat of about 3.2 mm. Against Phone, main lens, 1080p: it is clear where the shot is framed, but not everywhere. It comes up around 4.5 m, 4.4 m, 4.7 m, so walking backwards from here makes it worse rather than better.
Colour
LowColour: Low risk, 1 of 3.
Navy and chalk sit well inside what every channel can hold. Nothing here is close to running out of room.
Channel under pressure: None
Glare
LowGlare: Low risk, 1 of 3.
Worsted wool scatters light rather than returning it. The surface stays matte at every angle tested.
No lighting change is needed for this cloth.
What a change fixes
Stay where you are.
At the distance you gave, this weave is comfortably resolved. It is the far end of the room that is the problem, not the near end.
What no change fixes
Nothing. Everything this read found can be worked around.
What this read cannot know
- Which sensor is actually behind the lens, and at what resolution it is recording. Two cameras with the same stated resolution can sample a weave completely differently.
- The bitrate the stream is compressed at. Compression redistributes fine detail, and interference is fine detail.
- What the platform does to the file after it leaves you. The same garment can behave differently on two platforms because each one re-encodes it its own way.
Moire read low, so no motion clip is produced. There would be nothing on it.























